Loading...
Estimate the perplexity of your writing through the part of it you can actually edit: word variation. The checker scores your vocabulary with a length-robust moving-window measure (MATTR), reports your type-token ratio, and lists the words your draft leans on most. Repetitive, low-variety wording is one of the clearest reasons prose reads flat; this page makes it visible and countable.





Trusted by researchers publishing in
A paragraph is enough to start; a section or chapter gives the most reliable score. There is no word limit.
Estimated word variation on a 0-100 scale with a verdict band, plus your type-token ratio and unique-word count.
The repeated-words list shows where your draft leans hardest. Vary the verbs and connectors around your key terms, and leave the terms themselves alone.
Raw TTR falls as texts grow, so most online checkers punish long documents. The headline score here is MATTR over a 50-word window: a chapter and a paragraph are judged by the same yardstick.
A score alone is not actionable. The most-repeated-words list shows exactly which words carry too much of your text, counted with stopwords excluded.
The same word-variation estimate our humanizer dashboard reports on its In-Text Perplexity tile, running on your own device.
The tool reports lexical data and nothing else. No authorship claims, no detection promises: numbers you can check by hand.
Perplexity began as an engineering measure: how well does a language model predict each next word of a text? Prose built from stock phrases is easy to predict and scores low; prose that makes specific, varied choices surprises the model more. The measure crossed into writing culture when readers noticed the connection runs both ways. Text that a model finds predictable often feels predictable to a person too, because the same small vocabulary keeps arriving on schedule.
A web page cannot honestly compute model perplexity, but it can measure the ingredient of it that a writer controls directly: lexical variety. The standard yardstick is the type-token ratio, unique words over total words, and its length-robust refinement MATTR, which slides a fixed window through the text and averages the ratio inside it. Low scores have a consistent cause: a handful of words carrying too much of the text. Quick drafting does it, writing in a second language does it, and AI assistance does it in its own way, recycling favourite verbs and connectors evenly across every paragraph.
The revision skill is knowing which repetition to keep. Academic writing requires terminological consistency: a defined construct keeps its exact name every time it appears, and reviewers are right to distrust manuscripts that shuffle synonyms for their own key concepts. The variety worth adding lives everywhere else, in the verbs, connectors and descriptions around those fixed terms. "The results show" can become what the results actually do: demonstrate, contradict, narrow, confirm. Each swap raises variation as a side effect of saying something more precise, which is the right order of cause and effect.
Word variation is one layer of prose that reads naturally. For sentence-level rhythm, see the burstiness checker; for the specific words AI models overuse, the AI word cleaner; and for the full craft, our guide on making AI writing sound human.
Word variation rewards editing in some places and punishes it in others. The line between them is what makes academic revision a skill.
"The results show" three times in one paragraph is a variation problem. Results can demonstrate, confirm, narrow, contradict or qualify; each verb also says something more precise than "show". The same goes for connectors: however, although, whereas and despite carry distinctions that repeated "but" flattens.
If your study defines "working memory capacity", it must be "working memory capacity" on every page. Swapping in "cognitive load" or "mental bandwidth" for variety changes the claim. Reviewers read synonym-shuffled terminology as imprecision, not style. Your repeated-words list will contain your key terms; that repetition is correct.
Chasing the score by replacing plain words with rare ones raises variation and ruins prose: "use" does not improve by becoming "utilize". Genuine variety comes from saying more specific things, not from decorating the same things. If a swap does not add precision, keep the plain word.
Spot the stock phrases that quick drafting and AI assistance recycle, before a reviewer reads the same verb eleven times.
See which words an essay leans on and learn to vary the language around an argument instead of repeating its frame.
A second language offers a smaller active vocabulary, and repetition shows it. Measure progress as your working range grows.
Diagnose why a piece reads flat when grammar and structure are fine: the answer is often thirty words doing all the work.
ProofreaderPro's humanizer rewrites AI-flavoured vocabulary, phrasing and rhythm across your whole draft while preserving meaning, with output you review line by line. Built for researchers, free to try.
Humanize my writing free